01
Material risk, separated from noise
Distinguish normal startup trade-offs from issues that could change valuation, deal terms, integration plans, or time to value.

Technical due diligence
Independent technical due diligence that connects architecture, product, data, AI, security, and team capability to the investment thesis.
Decision support / 01
A useful diligence review does more than count defects. It identifies which technical realities could affect growth, margin, resilience, customer commitments, or the ability to execute the value-creation plan. Findings are prioritized by materiality and translated into practical next actions.
01
Distinguish normal startup trade-offs from issues that could change valuation, deal terms, integration plans, or time to value.
02
Turn findings into sequenced priorities for the first 100 days, with dependencies, ownership, and likely delivery implications.
03
Give investment teams, boards, founders, and technology leaders a common evidence base for the decisions ahead.
Assessment scope / 02
The scope follows the investment thesis and company stage. We go deep where the decision requires it rather than applying a generic checklist.
/01
Assess whether the current system can support expected growth, product expansion, availability needs, and integration complexity.
/02
Test whether product capability, roadmap priorities, and technical choices support the commercial plan and customer commitments.
/03
Review delivery performance, leadership, team structure, development practices, and concentration of critical knowledge.
/04
Identify material gaps in security, access, recoverability, operational resilience, and the evidence expected by customers.
/05
Examine data rights and quality, model dependencies, evaluation practices, governance, defensibility, and production readiness.
/06
Clarify where infrastructure costs, licensing, maintenance burden, or accumulated debt could constrain the plan.
How we deliver / 03
The process is evidence-led, proportionate, and designed to minimize disruption to management while still testing the important claims.
01
Align on the thesis, deal context, material questions, scope, access, and reporting needs.
02
Review documentation, architecture, code and delivery evidence, and interview the people accountable for the technology.
03
Challenge key assumptions, trace dependencies, and distinguish confirmed findings from areas of uncertainty.
04
Deliver a concise risk-ranked report, decision implications, and practical post-deal priorities.
Questions / 04
Technical due diligence is an independent assessment of a company's technology, product, data, security, and engineering capability. It helps an investor or acquirer understand material risks, strengths, dependencies, and the work required to support the investment plan.
It is most useful before an investment or acquisition, but it can also support follow-on funding, board reviews, leadership changes, major platform investments, or post-deal value-creation planning.
Where source access is appropriate, code and repository evidence can form part of the review. The depth depends on the investment question, timeline, company stage, and agreed scope.
Yes. AI diligence can cover data provenance and rights, model and vendor dependencies, evaluation quality, human oversight, security, unit economics, operational monitoring, and whether claimed differentiation is supported by the system.
The output typically includes an executive view, evidence-backed findings, materiality and confidence ratings, implications for the investment thesis, and prioritized actions for management and the first 100 days.
Start with the real problem
Share the deal context, company stage, thesis, and technical concerns. We will shape a proportionate scope around the decision you need to make.
Talk to KeshoLet's build / 05